Archived Story

Educators, legislators clash over deferred retirement repeal

Published 2:34pm Monday, March 28, 2011

By NEAL WAGNER / City Editor

A pair of Shelby County legislators said they supported a recently passed bill repealing the state’s deferred retirement option plan, but a local school administrator said he believes the sudden cut is “unfair.”

Through the plan, state employees, such as teachers, were allowed to continue working after they were eligible for retirement and place their retirement savings into a high-interest account.

“After you worked for 25 years and became eligible for the state’s retirement plan, you could work five years beyond that and take your retirement savings and put them into a special account with a high interest rate,” said state Sen. Cam Ward, R-Alabaster.

“It generated a lot of revenue for a lot of people,” Ward added, referencing those who took part in the program in the past.

The bill repealing the DROP program was signed into law March 24, and will allow only those who have already filed their application for the program and met its eligibility requirements to enroll.

Ward and state Rep. Mary Sue McClurkin, R-Indian Springs, said the program was a good idea, but it was negatively impacting the state’s education budget.

“It will bring us a savings of several million per year,” McClurkin said. “I approve of the repeal whole-heartedly.”

McClurkin said the program originally was intended to reward teachers who wanted to continue teaching beyond their retirement date.

“But now, it’s gotten way out of hand,” she said, noting the program cost the state more than $30 million per year. “The money we were spending on that program will now go straight to the classrooms. It will be placed into the state education trust fund.”

Ward said the plan would have been “worth saving” if it did not come at a cost to the state. However, he said he did not agree with the sudden nature of the repeal.

“I actually delayed repealing it in the Senate. I think the repeal date should have been later,” Ward said. “I think people who are already eligible for the program could have taken advantage of it.”

Riverchase Middle School Principal Charles Smith said the immediate repeal will have negative effects on teachers who have been planning for years to enter the program.

“(The repeal is) a burden to those who have been planning for this for years,” Smith said. “I knew people personally who were planning to get into the program, and all of a sudden it’s gone overnight. That’s unfair.

“How would (legislators) have felt if we were to say ‘We are taking this away from you tomorrow?’” Smith added. “Do I think the state should have limited the amount you could get from that program? Sure. But to suddenly cut someone’s retirement, it’s wrong.”

PrintFriendly
  1. seminoletide

    Why do you educators always stick politics into this issue? You say to “stop drinking the Republican Kool-Aid” – I’m a Libertarian, not a Republican.
    You also want to know why I “care what [y]our retirement looks like.” Of course we do – we have to pay for it. If you don’t care where YOUR money goes, that’s your problem.
    You say “maybe you should become a teacher and then your attitude would change.” NEWSFLASH – I was a teacher!! I simply decided to go into business for myself but my perspective about teachers having to take the cuts like the rest of us isn’t changed. No “ignorance” here . . .
    Just to be clear to teachers – capitalism IS A-OK – it is what gives you a job, allows you to keep a job and allows you to have ANY benefits. Your benefit structure is modeled after private business benefits. Your comments are indicative of the prevailing thought process in the teaching community that doesn’t believe in capitalism or private enterprise – rather you would have government controlling just about every facet of our lives.
    This is the bottom line people – YOU ARE NOT THE MAJORITY, WE ARE! You need to accept the fact that money doesn’t grow on government “trees” and right-thinking people have to lead and take control of this situation. Cuts HAVE to be made – if you don’t see that – you really aren’t very good educators because you lack the basics of research.

    (Report comment)

  2. shelby0417

    I believe that the DROP program, in the beginning, was a great idea. Over time, it was abused and that’s why some have a million + in their accounts.

    As far as getting paid for holidays (spring break, Christmas), a teacher is a 9 month employee. Their salary is only for 9 months, but the paychecks are spreadout into equal payments over 12 months. A teacher is paid for 187 days out of the year.

    (Report comment)

  3. seminoletide

    Wow, it continues to amaze me the audacity of the teaching community who continues to believe that they are some kind of privileged class that should be able to work 25 years and RETIRE and if they work a mere 5 more years they should be entitled to a bloated “retirement” program.

    You are PUBLIC SERVANTS! As long as your paycheck comes from the public, you should and you WILL be subject to what the MAJORITY of us Alabamians have been dealing with – DOWNSIZING.
    Get out of your ivory towers academia! You aren’t THAT special!

    (Report comment)

Editor's Picks