A Shelby County Circuit Court judge recently issued an order on a court appeal filed by three Pelham employees. (File)
A Shelby County Circuit Court judge recently issued an order on a court appeal filed by three Pelham employees. (File)

Archived Story

Judge: ‘Kangaroo court’ led to Pelham employees’ firing

Published 12:12pm Friday, October 18, 2013

By NEAL WAGNER / City Editor

A Shelby County Circuit Court judge has ordered Pelham leaders to void the 2012 firing of three Public Works employees, and has ordered the city to provide back pay to the employees from their date of termination.

In an order entered in the Shelby County Circuit Court on Oct. 17, Judge Hub Harrington ordered the city to rehire Public Works employees Dale Bailey, David McCall and Justin Martin, who were terminated from their positions in early 2012.

According to Harrington’s order, the three employees were terminated after the results of a Pelham Police Department investigation were provided to city officials. The investigation was launched after “employee complaints were received concerning misconduct on the part of certain individuals working in the Pelham Public Works Department.”

The police report stated, “it is our firm belief that the threatening language and harassment occurred,” but noted “there is no proof to sustain most of the specific allegations.”

Shortly after the police report was issued, the three employees, who were then plaintiffs in a civil lawsuit against the city, were terminated from their positions. Other city employees who were “alleged to have participated in the inappropriate conduct” and who were not plaintiffs in the lawsuit against the city were not terminated, Harrington wrote.

The employees then appealed the firing to the city’s Personnel Board.

During the Personnel Board appeal hearing, “the only testimony elicited by the board was that of the three terminated employees and no other,” according to Harrington’s order.

After the Personnel Board upheld the three employees’ termination in April 2012, the employees appealed the decision to the Circuit Court.

In his order, Harrington wrote the city’s Personnel Board “considered the burden of proof to be upon the accused employees to prove their innocence,” and claimed the board held the appeal hearing to “feign compliance” with the Alabama Civil Service Law.

“Had the city actually attempted to justify the termination rather than simply holding a kangaroo court, the outcome of this case could well have been different,” Harrington wrote. “The court also notes that since this matter arose, the city administration has completely changed.

“The court trusts that the new administration will heed the sage advice offered by the police department investigators and restore order to the Public Works Department,” Harrington wrote.

On Oct. 18, Pelham City Attorney Frank “Butch” Ellis said he did not want to offer comment on Harrington’s order before speaking with Pelham officials. Pelham Mayor Gary Waters said he and the Pelham City Council still must decide if it will accept or appeal Harrington’s ruling.


    Here we go again ? If you will think back Mayor Hayes sit on a personnel board and his board had the last say in fireing these people and he did that so Please tell it like it happen not like you wanted it to happen

  • pantherlover

    Yet another screw up of the Murphy/Nichols/Meadows/Dickens era that has been rectified.

Editor's Picks

Introducing your next best ‘fur-riend’

Dena is a 1-year-old shepherd mix with a sleek black coat and a heart the size of the moon. She is very excited when she ... Read more

Two great reasons to adopt a cat

Jynx is a 2-year-old tuxedo cat. She may look ready for a formal event, but this girl would rather hand out and play with her ... Read more

Paws and Gabby need homes

Paws is a short little lab mix with stumpy legs, a round belly, grey hairs on her muzzle and a heart the size of a ... Read more